![]() |
||||||||||
| Home | Research | Policy | Clinical Practice | For Parents | ASI | Products & Services | Resources | About Us | ||
| TRI Sections | SECTION
ON LAW & ETHICS Section Director: David S. Festinger, Ph.D. Selected Projects: Research and Evaluation Improving the Ethics of Research: Development of the Coercion Assessment Scale: Karen Dugosh, Ph.D. In this NIDA-funded project, a Coercion Assessment Scale (CAS) will be developed and evaluated, responding to the need for an instrument to accurately measure perceptions of coercion among substance abusing criminal justice clients participating in research. Much like consent quizzes and tests of cognitive functioning, the CAS will be useful for identifying individuals who are not appropriate for research participation or who need enhanced consent procedures because of their level of perceived coercion. In this context, the CAS may be particularly useful to research staff, research intermediaries, and ethics review boards. Read Abstract. The Role of Judicial Status Hearings in Drug Court: Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. In this groundbreaking study funded by NIDA and CSAT, drug court defendants were randomly assigned to attend court hearings either biweekly or as needed when they encounter problems in the program. Otherwise, all participants received the same treatment, urinalyses, rewards and sanctions. Findings indicated that “high-risk” clients (i.e., antisocial personality disorder [APD] or previous failure in drug abuse treatment) had substantially better outcomes when required to attend more frequent status hearings. In contrast, “low-risk” clients performed equally well, or better, when they were required to only attend hearings as needed. These findings were reproduced in several adult felony and misdemeanor drug courts located in both urban and rural communities, and were further supported in a prospective study in which clients are matched to dosage of judicial status hearings based on their risk status. Read Story. Services Research on Sanctions and Rewards in Drug Court: Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. In this study drug court clients are randomly assigned to receive sanctions for infractions, rewards for accomplishments, or both. The study is isolating the operative effects of each by examining participants’ drug and alcohol use, criminal recidivism, and psychosocial functioning monthly during treatment and at six and 12 months post-admission to drug court. Preliminary findings suggest that augmented positive rewards may help clients achieve treatment goals more quickly, and that clients with specific risk factors (i.e., younger, criminal history, psychopathy) achieved better outcomes when assigned to the enhanced rewards conditions. Effects
of Youth Exposure to Drug-Related Websites: Steven Belenko, Ph.D. STI/HIV
Risk, Services, and Drug Use for Young Arrestees; Steven Belenko, Ph.D. |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Quick Links | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||